IEC61511 Requirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9.4
The reliability data uncertainties shall be assessed and
taken into account when calculating the failure measure.
|
|
|
NOTE 1 The reliability
data uncertainties can be evaluated according to the amount of field feedback
(less field feedback results in more uncertainty) or/and exercise of expert
judgement.
|
|
|
|
|
Published standards
(IEC 60605-4), Bayesian approaches, engineering judgement techniques, etc.
can be used to estimate the reliability data uncertainties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-use of an upper bound
confidence of 70 % for each input reliability parameter instead of its mean
in order to obtain conservative point estimations of the failure measures
|
|
|
-use the probabilistic
distributions functions of input reliability parameters, perform Monte Carlo
simulations to obtain an histogram representing the
|
|
|
distribution of the
failure measure and assess a conservative value from this distribution (e.g.,
that there is a 90 % confidence that the true failure measure is better than
the value calculated).
|
|
16.2.2
Operation and maintenance procedures shall be developed
in accordance with the relevant safety planning and shall provide the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) procedures for collecting data related to
the demand rate and SIS reliability parameters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 1 Collection and analysis of
failure data has many benefits including the potential to reduce maintenance
costs
|
|
|
if failures rates in operation are
significantly lower than what were predicted during design.
|
|
|
Implementation costs of new
installations can also be reduced because new designs can be based on less
conservative failure rates.
|
|
|
How
to Use the Reliability Calculator
|
|
There are
two possible approaches to determine the Prio Use failure rate
|
|
|
a) Bayesian: You have prior
knowledge failure rate of similar devices
|
|
|
b) Chi-Sq: You have a device with no industry
published failure rate data
|
|
|
BAYESIAN
METHODOLOGY (Used if you have no historical data on your devices)
|
|
1) Based in
the two options above, enter the reliability data Bayesian Method
|
|
2) Select
the target confidance of the data point that you have defined as the high
confidance data.
|
|
This data will have the worst failure rate
and thus the highest confidance
|
|
|
- Typical confidance is 90 to
95%
|
|
|
- The software will select the
distribution that bests represents your data and target confidance
|
|
|
- The actual confidance will be
shown and the failure rate to use in your SIL Calculations
|
|
3) Enter the
total number of hours of operation and the number of failures
|
|
|
-
If available enter the data for your devices currently installed.
|
|
|
- If no past failure data is
available, collect data and enter this
data in the future
|
|
|
- Select your upper bound confidance
limit (70% is the minimum)
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
Before you have collected your field data, select your initial device failure
rate. We recommend at least 5 device
failure rates to use Bayesian Prior Use methodology.
|
|
We
recommend that the data set be a collection of different failure rates with
values that represent the range of industry data.
|
|
One of the
values needs to be of 90%-95% probability confidence orthe highes failure
rate.
|
|
|
|
CHI-SQUARED
METHODOLOGY (Used if you have a volume of user historical data)
|
|
1) Based in
the two options above delete /clear the data set
|
|
2) Enter the
total number of hours of operation and the number of failures
|
|
|
- Enter the data for your devices
currently installed.
|
|
|
- Select your upper bound confidance
limit (70% is the minimum)
|
|